Blog

Can AI prompts used by an expert witness be discovered? A recent federal court order suggests they can. Explore the implications of CLF v. Shell for AI-assisted expert testimony and litigation strategy.

AI vendors are narrowing indemnities. And businesses adopting AI tools are increasingly retaining risks that vendors once absorbed. When it comes to AI tools, the standard SaaS contracting playbook doesn’t work.

Colorado’s SB 26-189, signed May 14, replaces the state’s original AI law with a notice-based framework. What survived, what didn’t, and what it signals.

Did Justin Bieber outsmart copyright law with YouTube videos and a laptop at Coachella? No. Let's talk about what actually happened.

Kommunity.app founder Amaury Abreu wrote in Technical.ly, making a strong case that AI adoption only works when people come first. And he was kind enough to quote me in the article. “Generative AI can analyze and summarize data efficiently, and usually accurately. But it can’t replace human interaction and understanding.”

The first two AI copyright cases have just settled: Vacker v. Eleven Labs and Bartz v. Anthropic. Both faced allegations of blatant infringement, reputational fallout, and billion-dollar valuations at risk. With 46 more cases still pending, these early settlements could reshape how courts and companies handle AI copyright disputes.